html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020614631,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176,1020614631,IC_kwDOAMm_X8481Vfn,14808389,2022-01-24T22:28:27Z,2022-01-24T22:46:02Z,MEMBER,"note that PEP440 itself is not really [consistent](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#version-epochs): it mentions both normal and zero-padded CalVer.

Also, in the issue in which `dask` discussed this, one of the people involved with the PyPA [stated](https://github.com/dask/community/issues/100#issuecomment-704468187) that the difference between omitting or keeping the zero-padding is purely aesthetic (both can be parsed using `packaging.version.Version` / `packaging.version.parse`). I assume that means we're free to choose? The `YYYY.MM.X` scheme seems to be fairly common now, though.

Edit: I would vote for zero-padding of the months because that will make it actually recognizable as a date.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108564253