html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6174#issuecomment-1018681263,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6174,1018681263,IC_kwDOAMm_X848t9ev,35968931,2022-01-21T16:48:42Z,2022-01-21T16:48:42Z,MEMBER,"> I don't think our project would add DataTree as a new dependency just for this as long as we have a very easy and viable solution of ourselves.

FYI the plan with DataTree is to eventually integrate the work upstream into xarray, so no new dependency would be required at that point. That might take a while however.

> If this would be communicated more transparently in the docstrings, it would bring us a big step closer to the solution of this issue

That's good at least! Do you have any suggestions for where the docs should be improved? PRs are of course always welcome too :grin: 

> one problem left: Getting a full list of all groups contained in a NetCDF4 file so that we can read them all in.
>
> I would insist that xarray should be able to do this. Maybe we need a open_datasets_from_groups function for that, or rather a function list_datasets. But it should somehow be solvable within the xarray API without requiring a two-year debate about the management and representation of hierarchical data structures.

I agree, and would be open to a function like this (even if eventually DataTree renders it redundant). It's definitely an omission on our part that xarray still doesn't provide an easy way to do this - I've found myself wanting to easily see all the groups multiple times. However, my understanding is that [it's slightly tricky to implement](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4840#issuecomment-766198081), though suggestions/corrections are welcome!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108138101
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6174#issuecomment-1017782089,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6174,1017782089,IC_kwDOAMm_X848qh9J,35968931,2022-01-20T18:11:26Z,2022-01-20T18:12:32Z,MEMBER,"> In my case, we are talking about a very unusual application of the NetCDF4 groups feature: We store literally thousands of very small NetCDF datasets in a single file. A file containing 3000 datasets is typically not larger than 100 MB.

Ah - thanks for the clarification as to the context @tovogt !

> So, my request is really about the I/O performance, and I don't need a full-fledged hierarchical data management API in xarray for that.

That's fair enough.

> On our cluster this means that writing that 100 MB file takes 10 hours with your DataTree implementation, and 30 minutes with my helper functions. For reading, the effect is smaller, but still noticeable.

So are you asking if:
a) We should add a function to xarray which uses the same trick your helper functions do, for when people have a similar problem to you?
b) We should use the same trick your helper functions do to rewrite the I/O implementation of DataTree to only require one open/close? (It seems to me that this could be the best of both worlds, once implemented.)
c) Whether there is some other way to do this even faster than your helper functions?

EDIT: Tagging @alexamici / @aurghs  for their backends expertise + interest in DataTree","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108138101
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6174#issuecomment-1016705107,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6174,1016705107,IC_kwDOAMm_X848mbBT,35968931,2022-01-19T17:37:12Z,2022-01-19T18:05:07Z,MEMBER,"> I would like to have a function xr.to_netcdf that writes a list (or a dictionary) of datasets to a single NetCDF4 file. 

If you've read through all of #4118 you will have seen that there is a [prototype package](https://github.com/TomNicholas/datatree) providing a nested data structure which can handle groups. Using `DataTree` we can easily write a dictionary of datasets to a single netCDF file as groups:

```python
from datatree import DataTree

dt = DataTree.from_dict(ds_dict)
dt.to_netcdf('filepath.nc')
```

(Here if you want groups within groups then the keys in the dictionary should be specified like filepaths, e.g. `/group1/group2/ds_name`.)

> Ideally there should also be a way to read many datasets at once from a single NetCDF4 file using xr.open_dataset.

Again `DataTree` allows you to open all the groups at once, returning a tree-like structure which contains all the groups:

```python
dt = open_datatree('filepath.nc')
```

To extract all the groups as individual datasets you can do this to recreate the dictionary of datasets:

```python
ds_dict = {node.pathstr: node.ds for node in dt.subtree}
```

> However, this is really slow when you have many (hundreds or thousands of) small datasets because the file is opened and closed in every iteration.
>
> Currently, I'm using the following read/write functions to achieve the same:

Is your solution noticeably faster? We (@jhamman and I) haven't really thought about speed of DataTree I/O yet I don't think, preferring to just make something simple which works for now. The current [I/O code for DataTree is here](https://github.com/TomNicholas/datatree/blob/main/datatree/io.py).

Despite that project only being a prototype, it is still probably the best solution to your problem that we currently have (at least the neatest). If you are interested in trying it out and reporting any problems then that would be greatly appreciated!

EDIT: The [idea discussed here](https://github.com/TomNicholas/datatree/issues/51) might also be of interest to you.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108138101