html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/604#issuecomment-263807796,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/604,263807796,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2MzgwNzc5Ng==,13906519,2016-11-30T08:00:48Z,2016-11-30T08:00:48Z,NONE,"Hi.
I'm seeing the same plotting issues as @jhamman in the plot above Oct 2015 with 0.8.2. Basically, all (most?) operations on the first subplots' axis differ.
Is there a fix/ workaround for this?
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,109583455
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/604#issuecomment-145211793,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/604,145211793,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NTIxMTc5Mw==,2443309,2015-10-03T07:31:07Z,2015-10-03T07:31:07Z,MEMBER,"@shoyer - Thanks for taking a look. I'm going to leave the `subplot_kws=None` for consistency with Seaborn (not a big deal, I know) and because the tests started to hang when I changed this to a empty dict.
I'm going to open another PR to address the aspect and alignment when using Cartopy.
@clarkfitzg - Good luck on those quals. I've got to say, they weren't my favorite moments of grad school.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,109583455
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/604#issuecomment-145186575,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/604,145186575,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NTE4NjU3NQ==,1217238,2015-10-03T00:13:32Z,2015-10-03T00:13:32Z,MEMBER,"LGTM
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,109583455
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/604#issuecomment-145186449,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/604,145186449,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NTE4NjQ0OQ==,5356122,2015-10-03T00:11:42Z,2015-10-03T00:11:42Z,MEMBER,"This looks good. The general strategy with the `FacetGrid` was to bring the minimum amount of code in from Seaborn to make it do what we wanted. I see no issues in iterating like this, ie. bring in pieces of the code with tests as we need them.
Side note- I'm back in grad school studying for qualifying exams, so forgive me if it takes me a while to respond in the future.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,109583455
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/604#issuecomment-145186360,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/604,145186360,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0NTE4NjM2MA==,1217238,2015-10-03T00:10:25Z,2015-10-03T00:10:25Z,MEMBER,"Very nice!
I wonder if we could default to something like `aspect=None`, which indicates that the native aspect should be used for plots that supply a projection.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,109583455