html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/589#issuecomment-143335054,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/589,143335054,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0MzMzNTA1NA==,950575,2015-09-25T19:44:36Z,2015-09-25T19:44:36Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> single option for `open_dataset` that can disable all of xray's decoding options
I get that and I really like this option!
Not sure about `raw=False`
:+1: `decode=True`
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,108271509
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/589#issuecomment-143302566,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/589,143302566,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0MzMwMjU2Ng==,950575,2015-09-25T17:52:19Z,2015-09-25T17:52:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> This is similar to the situation with Unicode strings and bytes.
That comparison is what I meant. The concept is the same, as you said, but what comes to mind **is** the unicode/bytes situation and not netCDF compression and the various conventions.
I guess that what I do not like in the docs is the fact that compression and conventions are bagged together as ""encoding."" I see compression as ""encoding,"" but I cannot see all the conventions as encoding . Also, encoding or not, those are not CF rules to be called `decode_cf`. (But reading the CF-conventions usually gives me a headache so I might be wrong.)
Anyway, the docs are good and understandable,. My comments above are just minor issues I have with CF, NUG, and netCDF writing.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,108271509
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/589#issuecomment-143183227,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/589,143183227,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0MzE4MzIyNw==,950575,2015-09-25T10:29:59Z,2015-09-25T10:29:59Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Hi @shoyer I read the docs and I think it is pretty good. I am just not comfortable with the word `encoding`? That might confuse Pythonistas. Also `decode_cf=True` means a lot more than missing data (`_FillValue`), packing/unpacking (`scale_factor`/`add_offset`) [1] and dates parsing (which we inherited from the terrible COARDS but that is not the point here).
In fact the first two are netCDF features older than CF and they are described in the NetCDF User's Guide (sometimes called the ""NUG"") [2].
It is ugly but why not `decode_nug=True`?
[1] http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-conventions/cf-conventions-1.6/build/cf-conventions.html#terminology
[2] http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/netcdf.html#Attribute-Conventions
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,108271509