html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1016816597,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933,1016816597,IC_kwDOAMm_X848m2PV,14371165,2022-01-19T19:54:49Z,2022-01-19T19:54:49Z,MEMBER,I think you can use a lot of @dcherian's code as a base and then for starters see if it simply passes all the tests (including the ones you added here). If you make a draft PR here it's easier to help out as well if you're getting stuck.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1043746973
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1016805677,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933,1016805677,IC_kwDOAMm_X848mzkt,39069044,2022-01-19T19:39:57Z,2022-01-19T19:39:57Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Not sure I understand the blockwise approach well enough to make a PR, but maybe I'll give it a try at some point.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1043746973
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1016791909,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933,1016791909,IC_kwDOAMm_X848mwNl,14371165,2022-01-19T19:21:56Z,2022-01-19T19:21:56Z,MEMBER,"@slevang Yeah, the blockwise approach seems indeed nice. You're very welcome to continue with the blockwise approach in a different PR if you want to.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1043746973
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1015887354,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933,1015887354,IC_kwDOAMm_X848jTX6,39069044,2022-01-18T22:21:49Z,2022-01-18T22:45:16Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> @slevang are you still interested to continue this PR? I think that would be a worthwhile addition and should not be too much left to do. (What would be nice, however, are tests for the issues this fixes.)
Definitely! I got distracted is all, and @dcherian posted a nice solution in [#5629](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5629#issuecomment-960133879) that could allow us to preserve the ability to fit along a chunked dimension using blockwise operations and the dask `lstsq` implementation used by the existing `polyfit` code.
I'm happy to pick this back up and finish it off if there is consensus on the right way forward, but the blockwise approach seemed promising so I put this on hold.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1043746973
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-1015866453,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933,1015866453,IC_kwDOAMm_X848jORV,10194086,2022-01-18T21:50:48Z,2022-01-18T21:50:48Z,MEMBER,"@slevang are you still interested to continue this PR? I think that would be a worthwhile addition and should not be too much left to do. (What would be nice, however, are tests for the issues this fixes.)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1043746973
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5933#issuecomment-959541609,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5933,959541609,IC_kwDOAMm_X845MXFp,41898282,2021-11-03T15:56:14Z,2021-11-03T15:56:14Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"## Unit Test Results
6 files 6 suites 58m 4s [:stopwatch:](https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/blob/v1.20/README.md#the-symbols ""duration of all tests"")
16 290 tests 14 551 [:heavy_check_mark:](https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/blob/v1.20/README.md#the-symbols ""passed tests"") 1 739 [:zzz:](https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/blob/v1.20/README.md#the-symbols ""skipped / disabled tests"") 0 [:x:](https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/blob/v1.20/README.md#the-symbols ""failed tests"")
90 936 runs 82 738 [:heavy_check_mark:](https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/blob/v1.20/README.md#the-symbols ""passed tests"") 8 198 [:zzz:](https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/blob/v1.20/README.md#the-symbols ""skipped / disabled tests"") 0 [:x:](https://github.com/EnricoMi/publish-unit-test-result-action/blob/v1.20/README.md#the-symbols ""failed tests"")
Results for commit 62b4637d.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1043746973