html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2231#issuecomment-1100969650,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2231,1100969650,IC_kwDOAMm_X85Bn3ay,26384082,2022-04-17T23:43:46Z,2022-04-17T23:43:46Z,NONE,"In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity

If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the `stale` label; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,332018176
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2231#issuecomment-658429636,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2231,658429636,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1ODQyOTYzNg==,30219501,2020-07-14T21:45:39Z,2020-07-14T21:45:39Z,NONE,"Maybe, I will look to create a wrapper to handle the time_bounds issue for files following the cf-conventions. Note, that not only resample operations should modify the time_bounds, but also the reselect process should take care about time_bounds. As an example, we assume to have in one file A instantenous data (two times a day at 00 UTC and 12 UTC) and in the other file B aggregated data (daily averages with time stamps defined at the end of the aggregation interval). The reselection process of A in B should pick up only the times 12 UTC from file A (or even better: no time steps because aggregation interval in file B is not compatible with instantenous values).    ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,332018176
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2231#issuecomment-656965778,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2231,656965778,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1Njk2NTc3OA==,26384082,2020-07-11T01:55:37Z,2020-07-11T01:55:37Z,NONE,"In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity

If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the `stale` label; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,332018176
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2231#issuecomment-396957166,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2231,396957166,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5Njk1NzE2Ng==,30219501,2018-06-13T14:26:53Z,2018-06-13T14:26:53Z,NONE,I want to add that sometimes the variable time_bnds is already gone after resampling.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,332018176