html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2227#issuecomment-558693816,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2227,558693816,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1ODY5MzgxNg==,1200058,2019-11-26T15:54:25Z,2019-11-26T15:54:25Z,NONE,"Hi, I'd like to understand how `isel` works exactly in conjunction with dask arrays.
As it seems, #3481 propagates the `isel` operation onto each dask chunk for lazy evaluation. Is this correct?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,331668890
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2227#issuecomment-396675417,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2227,396675417,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM5NjY3NTQxNw==,4180033,2018-06-12T17:45:14Z,2018-06-12T17:45:14Z,NONE,"I am sorry @rabernat and @maxim-lian ,
the variable's name *time* and the simple example with the greater than filter are misleading. In general, it is about using a boolean mask via `isel` and that it is very slow. In my code, I am not able to use your workaround since my boolean mask is more complex.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,331668890