html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5731#issuecomment-978098589,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5731,978098589,IC_kwDOAMm_X846TJmd,1217238,2021-11-24T17:48:52Z,2021-11-24T17:48:52Z,MEMBER,I have a follow-up PR that simplifies the internal logic a little bit more: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6025,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,976790237
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5731#issuecomment-977243782,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5731,977243782,IC_kwDOAMm_X846P46G,1217238,2021-11-23T22:47:30Z,2021-11-23T22:47:30Z,MEMBER,"Checking in here -- it seems like this PR surfaced an existing bug (incorrect calculation of correlation when using dask), at the same time as it corrected a different bug, which is removing the hard dependency on dask for calculating correlation?

If I'm understanding correctly, this is still a net win (fixing one bug), so it probably makes sense to merge it now and save the other bug fix for a later issue?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,976790237