html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4922#issuecomment-791011542,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4922,791011542,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc5MTAxMTU0Mg==,2448579,2021-03-04T23:02:48Z,2021-03-04T23:02:48Z,MEMBER,"```
# Just apply rolling to the base array.
ds.rolling(time=6, center=False, min_periods=1).mean()
```

I feel like this should not work i.e. rolling window length (6) < size along axis (3). So the bottleneck error seems right.

The chunk size error in the last example should go away with #4977","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,811321550
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4922#issuecomment-781571084,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4922,781571084,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MTU3MTA4NA==,2448579,2021-02-18T19:08:44Z,2021-02-18T19:08:44Z,MEMBER,"Maybe the padding is breaking down for length-1 arrays? 

I would look at `padded` in this function
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/c9b9eec73a033e275b6012e7d391dd42591ccf52/xarray/core/rolling.py#L461-L463","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,811321550