html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-763228697,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730,763228697,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MzIyODY5Nw==,13301940,2021-01-20T00:04:43Z,2021-01-20T00:04:43Z,MEMBER,"> The ""Overriding CI behaviors"" is fairly prominent in the PR template, when I wouldn't expect it to be used that often. Was that intended? Should it be a markdown comment?

The current choice was just a first stab at documenting the CI ""special"" behaviors. 

👍🏽  to making the ""overriding CI behaviors"" section a markdown comment and documenting this in the contributing guide (for convenience) if need be. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,773945564
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756310857,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730,756310857,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjMxMDg1Nw==,13301940,2021-01-07T18:53:48Z,2021-01-07T18:53:48Z,MEMBER,"Heres' what we get with `[skip-ci]` tag in the git commit message: Cc @dcherian 

<img width=""999"" alt=""Screen Shot 2021-01-07 at 11 51 26 AM"" src=""https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/13301940/103932342-edf2b480-50de-11eb-8694-6e54ef125c66.png"">
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,773945564
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756291965,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730,756291965,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjI5MTk2NQ==,13301940,2021-01-07T18:20:47Z,2021-01-07T18:20:47Z,MEMBER,"> @andersy005 - I merged #4688, so we just have some conflicts to sort out now.

I'm working on it. Will update this branch shortly","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,773945564
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756248053,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730,756248053,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjI0ODA1Mw==,13301940,2021-01-07T17:06:54Z,2021-01-07T17:06:54Z,MEMBER,"> should we do `skip-ci` in a different PR?

I can take care of this in this PR. 

Please remind me... Is the objective here to disable all CIs when `[skip-ci]` is present in the git commit message?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,773945564
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-756243970,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730,756243970,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NjI0Mzk3MA==,13301940,2021-01-07T17:01:43Z,2021-01-07T17:01:43Z,MEMBER,"> @andersy005 - what do you think about just removing 3.6 from the test matrix for now? #4720 will go in soon.

👍🏽 Makes sense.... Done!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,773945564
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4730#issuecomment-754958057,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4730,754958057,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc1NDk1ODA1Nw==,13301940,2021-01-05T23:14:00Z,2021-01-05T23:18:48Z,MEMBER,"The `pre-commit/action` failure appears to be connected to https://github.com/pre-commit/action/issues/53. ~~I don't know how to address the issue yet...~~ 

Update: Restarting the workflow run fixes it ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,773945564