html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4333#issuecomment-674271421,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4333,674271421,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NDI3MTQyMQ==,5635139,2020-08-14T21:03:54Z,2020-08-14T21:03:54Z,MEMBER,Thanks @Thomas-Z ! Great to have you as a contributor,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,676696822
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4333#issuecomment-674206025,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4333,674206025,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NDIwNjAyNQ==,2448579,2020-08-14T18:28:23Z,2020-08-14T18:28:23Z,MEMBER,Thanks @Thomas-Z . I see this is your first PR here. Welcome to xarray!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,676696822
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4333#issuecomment-672088818,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4333,672088818,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MjA4ODgxOA==,1217238,2020-08-11T16:53:59Z,2020-08-11T16:53:59Z,MEMBER,"> Do we want DataArray.to_dataframe to be consistent with Dataset.to_dataframe regarding the default dimension ordering (i.e. alphabetically) or do we want to keep the current behavior (DataArray.dims order)?

`DataArray.to_dataframe()` should keep the current behavior based on the dimension order.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,676696822
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4333#issuecomment-672081839,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4333,672081839,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MjA4MTgzOQ==,1217238,2020-08-11T16:44:23Z,2020-08-11T16:44:23Z,MEMBER,"I like `dim_order` a little bit better than `dims` because it's clear that you need supply all the dimensions, not just a subset (which is usually the case for `dims`)","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,676696822
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4333#issuecomment-672055923,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4333,672055923,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MjA1NTkyMw==,2448579,2020-08-11T16:10:24Z,2020-08-11T16:10:24Z,MEMBER,OK consistency with `to_dask_dataframe` is a good idea. Maybe stick with `dim_order` for now and we can change both later if someone really wants it?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,676696822
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4333#issuecomment-672026071,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4333,672026071,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MjAyNjA3MQ==,2448579,2020-08-11T15:42:53Z,2020-08-11T15:42:53Z,MEMBER,How about `dims: Iterable[Hashable]`?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,676696822
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4333#issuecomment-671956314,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4333,671956314,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MTk1NjMxNA==,5635139,2020-08-11T13:45:33Z,2020-08-11T13:45:33Z,MEMBER,"Great, thanks @Thomas-Z , LGTM

Does anyone have thoughts on the kwarg name? `dim_order` seems reasonable, though IIRC we don't use it elsewhere","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,676696822