html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4300#issuecomment-671475798,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4300,671475798,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MTQ3NTc5OA==,1217238,2020-08-10T17:06:11Z,2020-08-10T17:06:11Z,MEMBER,"+1 for just wrapping the existing functionality in SciPy for now. If we want a version of curve_fit` that supports dask, I would suggest implementing `curve_fit` with dask first, and then using that from xarray.

I am OK with using `inspect` from the standard library for determining _default_ parameter names. `inspect.signature` is reasonably robust. But there should definitely be an optional argument for setting parameter names explicitly.","{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,671609109