html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3926#issuecomment-611372701,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3926,611372701,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxMTM3MjcwMQ==,35968931,2020-04-09T07:19:34Z,2020-04-09T07:19:34Z,MEMBER,"Just noticed there's a [section](http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/api.html#deprecated-pending-deprecation) of the API reference for `Deprecated/Pending Deprecation`, but `auto_combine` was never added to it...","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,592331420
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3926#issuecomment-607989892,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3926,607989892,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzk4OTg5Mg==,35968931,2020-04-02T17:36:19Z,2020-04-02T17:36:39Z,MEMBER,"> To make the docs CI pass

Thanks @keewis .

> Shouldn't we change the FutureWarning to a DeprecationWarning before removing auto_combine? 

I wasn't even aware that there were two types of warnings I could have used for this. I was taking ""deprecating"" to mean ""removed"" and ""starting the deprecation cycle"" to mean ""start warning people it will soon be removed"". The warning messages said ""will no longer accept"" and ""will require"" in ""version 0.15"" - that's probably authoritative enough isn't it?

> There was a case I ran in to where the old auto_combine was needed and none of the newer options worked.

I think that was always a possible edge case - I would very much like to see it though @dcherian , if only so that we can put a ""what to do if"" section in the docs.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,592331420
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3926#issuecomment-607807193,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3926,607807193,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNzgwNzE5Mw==,35968931,2020-04-02T12:10:33Z,2020-04-02T12:10:33Z,MEMBER,It would also be good to include any improvement to the relevant docs (e.g. #3830) in the same release.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,592331420