html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3816#issuecomment-622128514,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3816,622128514,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyMjEyODUxNA==,1312546,2020-04-30T21:38:21Z,2020-04-30T21:38:21Z,MEMBER,"Makes sense. template seems fine.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:35 PM Deepak Cherian
wrote:
> Thanks for the review @TomAugspurger
>
> Question on the name template. I think in dask.dataframe and dask.array
> we might call this meta. Is that keyword already used elsewhere in
> xarray? template is also a fine name though.
>
> I added the meta kwarg to apply_ufunc so that users could pass that down
> to dask i.e. that meta = dask's meta = np.ndarray or something like that.
> So I'd like to avoid reusing meta here where it would exclusively be an
> xarray object ≠ dask's meta
>
> BUT it seems to me like there's a better name than template. Any ideas?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> , or
> unsubscribe
>
> .
>
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,573768194