html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3816#issuecomment-622128514,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3816,622128514,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyMjEyODUxNA==,1312546,2020-04-30T21:38:21Z,2020-04-30T21:38:21Z,MEMBER,"Makes sense. template seems fine. On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:35 PM Deepak Cherian wrote: > Thanks for the review @TomAugspurger > > Question on the name template. I think in dask.dataframe and dask.array > we might call this meta. Is that keyword already used elsewhere in > xarray? template is also a fine name though. > > I added the meta kwarg to apply_ufunc so that users could pass that down > to dask i.e. that meta = dask's meta = np.ndarray or something like that. > So I'd like to avoid reusing meta here where it would exclusively be an > xarray object ≠ dask's meta > > BUT it seems to me like there's a better name than template. Any ideas? > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > , or > unsubscribe > > . > ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,573768194