html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2908#issuecomment-485037541,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2908,485037541,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4NTAzNzU0MQ==,2448579,2019-04-19T23:30:23Z,2019-04-19T23:30:23Z,MEMBER,@emaroon Are you up for sending in a pull request? :),"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,435311415
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2908#issuecomment-485032817,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2908,485032817,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4NTAzMjgxNw==,1217238,2019-04-19T22:54:42Z,2019-04-19T22:54:42Z,MEMBER,"I suspect that if you had `bottleneck` installed this would actually be OK on memory usage.

Our current solution for cases where bottleneck is not installed involves creating a very large array in memory. It would be nice to allows for a less memory hungry version as an option, even if it will be a little slower.

This also is probably an opportunity for documentation.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,435311415