html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2010#issuecomment-375750884,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2010,375750884,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NTc1MDg4NA==,5635139,2018-03-23T17:57:11Z,2018-03-23T17:57:11Z,MEMBER,"> I think we need to document more clearly that min_periods option is just neglected if using construct method.

I also think we could label `construct` as advanced / experimental. It's extremely cool, but for traditional cases, it's probably more cool than required, and less well tested than the standard methods.

At the moment we say ""You can use this for more advanced rolling operations, such as strided rolling, windowed rolling, convolution, short-time FFT, etc.""; 
I'm imagining adding something like ""For standard operations above, there is no need to use `construct`"". Or adding an `Experimental` marker
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,308030789