html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1415#issuecomment-302897807,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1415,302897807,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMjg5NzgwNw==,1217238,2017-05-20T20:46:55Z,2017-05-20T20:46:55Z,MEMBER,"Sure, there's no harm in asking. My guess is that this isn't a good fit, but I'm not entirely sure.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,230158616
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1415#issuecomment-302879988,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1415,302879988,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwMjg3OTk4OA==,1217238,2017-05-20T15:28:55Z,2017-05-20T15:28:55Z,MEMBER,"I would be OK with this if it required explicitly setting a keyword argument, e.g., `ds.to_netcdf(..., allow_pickle=True)` and `xarray.open_dataset(..., allow_pickle=True)`. This could be hooked into xarray's existing coding/decoding layer in a relatively straightforward fashion: see [`ensure_dtype_not_object`](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/d5c7e0612e8243c0a716460da0b74315f719f2df/xarray/conventions.py#L684) for where this is caught in the current code. (We would also need something at a lower level in the netCDF4 specific reader/writer to handle `uint8` VLType.)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,230158616