html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1358#issuecomment-292733095,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1358,292733095,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MjczMzA5NQ==,1217238,2017-04-08T17:29:25Z,2017-04-08T17:29:25Z,MEMBER,"> If by packaging you mean distributing here, then I am very disappointed by your statement. From a package maintainer's perspective, I would consider the lack of a test suite a severe regression, should the latter be removed from source distribution in the future.

I agree. I meant not distributing `conftests.py` in the pypi package (and making the test suite run without it), not removing the test suite.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,220160378
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1358#issuecomment-292681495,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1358,292681495,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MjY4MTQ5NQ==,1217238,2017-04-08T00:31:31Z,2017-04-08T00:31:31Z,MEMBER,"This is embarrassing -- thanks for the catch.

`conftest.py` seems to be much more troublesome than the pytest documentation suggests. Another alternative is to make the test-suite robust to its absence, and not bother to packaging it, given that it is mostly useful for development purposes.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,220160378