html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7489#issuecomment-1410893053,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7489,1410893053,IC_kwDOAMm_X85UGIT9,2448579,2023-01-31T18:45:38Z,2023-01-31T18:45:54Z,MEMBER,"Yup, after thinking about it for a while, this seems like an edge case that's not common in user code.

Thanks @jrbourbeau !","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1562840229
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7489#issuecomment-1409077985,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7489,1409077985,IC_kwDOAMm_X85T_NLh,2448579,2023-01-30T18:03:36Z,2023-01-30T18:03:36Z,MEMBER,"Oh hmm that was trivial.

Is this a regression though? 

The test has a `distributed.Client` created in a context manager.
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/d385e2063a6b5919e1fe9dd3e27a24bc7117137e/xarray/tests/test_distributed.py#L104-L116

but it seems like `dask.base.get_scheduler` isn't returning a `distributed.Client` any more (this is called somewhere in the `to_netcdf` call chain)
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/d385e2063a6b5919e1fe9dd3e27a24bc7117137e/xarray/backends/locks.py#L71-L106

`actual_get` is now `get_sync` whereas it used to be a the `get` for a `distributed.Client`.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1562840229