html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7401#issuecomment-1366550470,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7401,1366550470,IC_kwDOAMm_X85Rc-fG,10194086,2022-12-28T10:36:03Z,2022-12-28T10:36:03Z,MEMBER,"Good point. Combining two `FacetGrids` is a good use case. My intuition would be to allow passing _exactly_ the correct number of axes and not the figure. But then I have not heard from subfigure before now and this may also be a valid option.

```python
f, axs = plt.subplots(2, 4)
da1.plot(col='season', ax=axs[0, :])
da2.plot(col='season', ax=axs[1, :])
```

","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1510151748
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7401#issuecomment-1364669991,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7401,1364669991,IC_kwDOAMm_X85RVzYn,10194086,2022-12-25T12:01:27Z,2022-12-25T12:01:27Z,MEMBER,I think the usual workflow is to create the figure with gridspec and then update the created subplots and figure. Is there something that is not possible if done this way around? ,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1510151748