html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7278#issuecomment-1316230358,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7278,1316230358,IC_kwDOAMm_X85OdBTW,4160723,2022-11-16T02:57:48Z,2022-11-16T02:57:48Z,MEMBER,"👍 

Use it at your own risk 😉 ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1444752393
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7278#issuecomment-1311942192,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7278,1311942192,IC_kwDOAMm_X85OMqYw,4160723,2022-11-11T16:52:54Z,2022-11-11T16:52:54Z,MEMBER,"You may look at the logic implemented in the `map_index_queries()` function in `xarray.core.indexing`. This function is still not public API, but it calls `.sel()` for each index object, which should be more stable (although experimental).

Eventually we'll probably make `merge_sel_results()` public too. It might be useful for third-party indexes.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1444752393
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7278#issuecomment-1311911082,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7278,1311911082,IC_kwDOAMm_X85OMiyq,35968931,2022-11-11T16:21:21Z,2022-11-11T16:21:21Z,MEMBER,"> I realise that this was probably a function intended for internal use only

Yes, everything under `xarray.core` is internal, and unfortunately internal functions aren't publicly supported, so we provide no guarantee that they will still work/exist between versions.

> Is there a better way to do this? What replaces this function?

@benbovy should know!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1444752393