html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6795#issuecomment-1266702407,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6795,1266702407,IC_kwDOAMm_X85LgFhH,14808389,2022-10-04T09:59:29Z,2022-10-04T15:28:25Z,MEMBER,"not really, I wanted to wait until `set_xindex` was in main (the PR has been merged last week) and have not looked at it since.

Edit: we don't yet have tests, though

There's two issues left that might need a bit of discussion: in [8f21df3](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6795/commits/8f21df36e22d996bb436f87df1a3257da6015c47) I skipped displaying default `PandasIndex` instances because that's basically redundant with the `*` on coordinates (and it would have required me to update a lot of doctests, which will probably make this a breaking change). If we decide to revert that, should we mark every coordinate with an index with a `*`?

Another proposal we had was to replace the ""dimensions without coordinates"" line with a ""coordinates without index"" line. @benbovy, this might be a misunderstanding on my part, but I thought ""dimension coordinates"" (and in particular their indexes) are still used for alignment? If so, I think we might need both lines.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1306887842