html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6467#issuecomment-1096882307,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6467,1096882307,IC_kwDOAMm_X85BYRiD,5635139,2022-04-12T15:33:14Z,2022-04-12T15:33:14Z,MEMBER,Thank you @delgadom !!,"{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1199127752
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6467#issuecomment-1096882020,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6467,1096882020,IC_kwDOAMm_X85BYRdk,5635139,2022-04-12T15:32:59Z,2022-04-12T15:32:59Z,MEMBER,"I'm merging this and fixing the `whatsnew` on L39 in a different PR.

Not a great CI run the past few days!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1199127752
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6467#issuecomment-1094412333,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6467,1094412333,IC_kwDOAMm_X85BO2gt,5635139,2022-04-10T23:47:47Z,2022-04-10T23:47:47Z,MEMBER,"> hmm. readthedocs failed because of concurrency limits (my bad) but seems to have failed to automatically retry. can someone give it a nudge?

Hmmm, I haven't seen this before, maybe it's a change, maybe it's a fluke. I hit the button, let's see if it resolves.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1199127752
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6467#issuecomment-1094340795,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6467,1094340795,IC_kwDOAMm_X85BOlC7,5635139,2022-04-10T18:19:25Z,2022-04-10T18:19:25Z,MEMBER,"Thanks @delgadom ! 

I think this is a good idea! Any thoughts?

Note @delgadom 's thoughtful comment in the issue:
> I haven't yet investigated what would happen with chunked, sparse, or other complex arrays, or if it's compatible with trees and other things on the roadmap. It's possible this breaks things I'm not imagining. Currently, `where(cond, other)` and `where(cond, drop=True)` are well-tested, flexible operations, and I don't see why allowing their union would break anything, but I'll wait to hear from the experts on that front!

","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1199127752