html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1057657161,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176,1057657161,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_CpFJ,1217238,2022-03-03T04:32:10Z,2022-03-03T04:32:10Z,MEMBER,"Breaking changes will continue to be very rare, and whenever possible will be preceeded by deprecation or future warnings for multiple months.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108564253
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1025382413,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176,1025382413,IC_kwDOAMm_X849HhgN,2443309,2022-01-31T05:02:19Z,2022-01-31T05:02:19Z,MEMBER,"After thinking on this one a bit, I'm back to thinking we should zero-pad the months. I don't think there is a clear right choice here, with both options offering pros/cons. Thanks @ksunden in particular for sharing your perspective). I suggest we try this in `2022.02.0`. See #6214 for more details.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108564253
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020614631,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176,1020614631,IC_kwDOAMm_X8481Vfn,14808389,2022-01-24T22:28:27Z,2022-01-24T22:46:02Z,MEMBER,"note that PEP440 itself is not really [consistent](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#version-epochs): it mentions both normal and zero-padded CalVer.
Also, in the issue in which `dask` discussed this, one of the people involved with the PyPA [stated](https://github.com/dask/community/issues/100#issuecomment-704468187) that the difference between omitting or keeping the zero-padding is purely aesthetic (both can be parsed using `packaging.version.Version` / `packaging.version.parse`). I assume that means we're free to choose? The `YYYY.MM.X` scheme seems to be fairly common now, though.
Edit: I would vote for zero-padding of the months because that will make it actually recognizable as a date.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108564253
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020525378,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176,1020525378,IC_kwDOAMm_X8480_tC,14371165,2022-01-24T20:37:32Z,2022-01-24T20:37:32Z,MEMBER,"> Note that [PEP 440](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#integer-normalization) normalizes integers in version strings, so leading zeros are ignored and the version as it appears in PyPI would be `2022.1.0`, as that displays the normalized version string.
>
> On my own packages which I use calver for I have opted to not have leading zeros such that the ""canonical"" version matches the ""normalized"" version to avoid any confusion that may cause.
No opinion either way here but `2022.01.0` is an easier string to sort.
@jrbourbeau is this something dask has thought about?
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108564253
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020519502,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176,1020519502,IC_kwDOAMm_X8480-RO,13301940,2022-01-24T20:30:05Z,2022-01-24T20:30:05Z,MEMBER,"> Do others have thoughts here? I would support stripping the leading zeros from the MM part of the version string in favor of consistency here.
I'm in favor of a non-zero-padded version for the benefit of having canonical/normalized versions that also match git tags/history
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108564253
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6176#issuecomment-1020463316,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6176,1020463316,IC_kwDOAMm_X8480wjU,2443309,2022-01-24T19:27:38Z,2022-01-24T19:27:38Z,MEMBER,"Interesting insights @ksunden, thanks for sharing!
Do others have thoughts here? I would support stripping the leading zeros from the `MM` part of the version string in favor of consistency here. ","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1108564253