html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6136#issuecomment-1005727954,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6136,1005727954,IC_kwDOAMm_X8478jDS,14808389,2022-01-05T14:23:00Z,2022-01-05T14:23:27Z,MEMBER,"okay, thanks, we can take it from here.

Note that we have a CI to automatically run doctests, so you could in theory push to verify changes. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1093467156
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6136#issuecomment-1005039003,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6136,1005039003,IC_kwDOAMm_X847562b,14808389,2022-01-04T17:49:22Z,2022-01-04T17:49:22Z,MEMBER,"this does indeed look like a typo (even though as @mathause says that value will not be checked because the absence of `data` is checked first) but in any case it *is* valid to pass a `str`: `dims=""t""`, `dims=[""t""]` and `dims=(""t"",)` mean the same thing to the `DataArray` constructor for 1D data. Maybe we should just remove the parens to make this clear? I would have hoped that `black` takes care of something like that...

We also have the same issue in the docstring of `DataArray.from_dict`, which by the way would really benefit from converting the code block to a doctest-style example (it will fail right now).","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1093467156