html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5716#issuecomment-904437683,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5716,904437683,IC_kwDOAMm_X8416J-z,76039838,2021-08-24T08:33:50Z,2021-08-24T08:33:50Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Awesome, thanks @dcherian and all the reviewers!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,974659059 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5716#issuecomment-902581059,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5716,902581059,IC_kwDOAMm_X841zEtD,76039838,2021-08-20T10:00:04Z,2021-08-20T10:39:40Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Thank you @Illviljan @max-sixty I've changed the return type to `FrozenDict` and added a check to make sure that `set_options` changes are reflected in `get_options`. Edit: All unit tests are passing on my local PC but there's one failure in the github checks. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,974659059 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5698#issuecomment-900417932,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5698,900417932,IC_kwDOAMm_X841q0mM,76039838,2021-08-17T15:53:03Z,2021-08-17T15:53:03Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Hello, I'd like to take a crack at this, if no one else is already working on it. Would the idea be to use `xarray/xarray/core/options.py` as the template for options that can exist/ have been set and create a get method?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,968970143 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-889686492,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609,889686492,IC_kwDOAMm_X841B4nc,76039838,2021-07-30T07:19:19Z,2021-07-30T07:19:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Thanks for leading me through the process @keewis , it's my first code contribution to any open-source project. Hope to do more in the future.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,945434599 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-887356235,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609,887356235,IC_kwDOAMm_X8404_tL,76039838,2021-07-27T09:24:10Z,2021-07-27T09:24:10Z,CONTRIBUTOR,@keewis Done!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,945434599 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-887305146,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609,887305146,IC_kwDOAMm_X8404zO6,76039838,2021-07-27T08:09:27Z,2021-07-27T08:10:14Z,CONTRIBUTOR,@keewis thanks! Looks like most checks are successful now. Is there anything further I should do? Should I close the pull request?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,945434599 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-887282590,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609,887282590,IC_kwDOAMm_X8404tue,76039838,2021-07-27T07:33:27Z,2021-07-27T07:33:27Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"@dcherian @keewis Hey guys, a backend test is failing but I'm not sure why or how my change is affecting it. Would be grateful for a pointer.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,945434599 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-881283746,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609,881283746,IC_kwDOAMm_X840h1Ki,76039838,2021-07-16T08:47:00Z,2021-07-16T08:47:00Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Looks like the `backend_kwargs` argument is breaking the function. Should I just get rid of it and leave in `**kwargs`?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,945434599 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-881233598,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609,881233598,IC_kwDOAMm_X840ho6-,76039838,2021-07-16T07:19:24Z,2021-07-16T07:19:24Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Thanks everyone for the feedback. I've added a ``backend_kwargs`` and a ``**kwargs`` argument following the `xarray.open_dataset` style.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,945434599 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5609#issuecomment-880800433,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5609,880800433,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg4MDgwMDQzMw==,76039838,2021-07-15T15:39:04Z,2021-07-15T15:44:10Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> Should this pass `**kwargs` through rather than take an explicit `kwargs` arg? I am not sure about the nuances here, but the linked issue shows a h5netcdf function that follows the same pattern.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,945434599