html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/495#issuecomment-133003335,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/495,133003335,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzMzAwMzMzNQ==,358378,2015-08-20T13:11:49Z,2015-08-20T13:11:49Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"That's strange, I cannot reproduce the test failure on my system ...  Any ideas?
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,97237275
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/495#issuecomment-125250524,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/495,125250524,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNTI1MDUyNA==,358378,2015-07-27T15:47:17Z,2015-07-27T15:47:17Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"I'm not really happy with my implementation; the coordinate/variable handling in lines 1870-1884 are far from elegant.  But is there a nicer way to do this?
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,97237275
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/495#issuecomment-125244483,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/495,125244483,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNTI0NDQ4Mw==,358378,2015-07-27T15:27:48Z,2015-07-27T15:27:48Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> I wouldn't allow full control here, but maybe a keyword argument for
> choosing whether to take the ""lower"", ""upper"" or ""mean"" labels would be
> appropriate.

I don't see how 'mean' could work, as the coord might be of dtype str.
But I'm implementing 'upper' and 'lower'.  If the user wants something
different, she can always just swap the coord manually.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,97237275
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/495#issuecomment-124862963,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/495,124862963,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNDg2Mjk2Mw==,358378,2015-07-25T17:15:10Z,2015-07-25T17:15:10Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Actually, the current implementation leads to `0.0` for arrays inside a `Dataset` which don't have `dim` as a dimension. I personally would find it more intuitive if those arrays would not be touched at all.

Do you agree, or do you prefer this `0.0` for unaffected arrays?
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,97237275