html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2559#issuecomment-444514608,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2559,444514608,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0NDUxNDYwOA==,6042212,2018-12-05T14:58:58Z,2018-12-05T14:58:58Z,CONTRIBUTOR,I like those timings.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,382497709
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2559#issuecomment-443804859,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2559,443804859,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MzgwNDg1OQ==,6042212,2018-12-03T17:55:51Z,2018-12-03T17:55:51Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"LGTM

Do you think there should be more explicit text of how to add consolidation to existing zarr/xarray data-sets, rather than creating them with consolidation turned on?

We may also need some text around updating consolidated data-sets, but that can maybe wait to see what kind of usage people try.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,382497709
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2559#issuecomment-442801741,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2559,442801741,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MjgwMTc0MQ==,703554,2018-11-29T11:33:33Z,2018-11-29T11:33:33Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Great to see this. On the API, FWIW I'd vote for using the same keyword (``consolidated``) in both, less burden on the user to remember what to use.","{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,382497709
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2559#issuecomment-442581092,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2559,442581092,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MjU4MTA5Mg==,6042212,2018-11-28T19:49:43Z,2018-11-28T19:49:43Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Glad to see this happening, by the way. Once in, catalogs using intake-xarray can be updated and I don't thin the code will need to change.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,382497709
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2559#issuecomment-442580432,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2559,442580432,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MjU4MDQzMg==,6042212,2018-11-28T19:47:43Z,2018-11-28T19:47:43Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Will the default for both options be `False` for the time being?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,382497709
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2559#issuecomment-442569498,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2559,442569498,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MjU2OTQ5OA==,31115101,2018-11-28T19:15:33Z,2018-11-28T19:15:33Z,CONTRIBUTOR,I remember dealing with this in my pull request -- if I recall correctly scheduler was pointing to the scheduler.get function instead. It was a minor bug that was either fixed in the next release of xarray (0.11.0) or Dask (0.20.1).,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,382497709