html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/996#issuecomment-246999780,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/996,246999780,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI0Njk5OTc4MA==,8982598,2016-09-14T12:39:41Z,2016-09-14T12:39:41Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"OK, I have stripped the Dataset/Array methods which I agree were largely redundant. Since this sets this type of comparison/merge slightly apart, `'no_conflicts'` seems the more intuitive wording when used only as a `compat` option so I've changed it to that.
And I've done a first pass at updating the docs.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,174404136
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/996#issuecomment-244612732,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/996,244612732,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI0NDYxMjczMg==,8982598,2016-09-04T16:23:21Z,2016-09-04T16:23:21Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> One potential concern here is that performance is not going to be so great if you attempt to combine a bunch of variables with lazy data loaded with dask, because each comparison will trigger a separate computation. To that end, it would be nice to do the safety check in a single dask operation.
I will have a look into how to do this, but am not that familiar with dask.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,174404136
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/996#issuecomment-244612031,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/996,244612031,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI0NDYxMjAzMQ==,8982598,2016-09-04T16:11:10Z,2016-09-04T16:11:10Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Ah sorry - yes rebased locally then mistakenly merged the remote fork...
> `compat='no_conflicts'` is possibly a better keyword argument.
Yes I thought that might be better also, the advantages of `'notnull_equals'`, (slightly more precise operational description and slightly better 'grammar' when using as a method: `if ds1.notnull_equals(ds2): ...` vs `if ds1.no_conflicts(ds2): ...`) are probably negligible since `'no_conflicts'` is more intuitive for `merge` - and this is likely the main usage.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,174404136