html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7573#issuecomment-1498200620,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7573,1498200620,IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZTLos,950575,2023-04-05T21:47:19Z,2023-04-05T21:47:19Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> With the current PR we would end up with two different build numbers with differing behaviour, which might confuse folks.

+1

> But I'd rely on @ocefpaf's expertise.

The PR is a good idea and we, conda-forge, even though about making something like that for all packages. The problem is that optional packages metadata in Python-land is super unreliable. So, doing it on a package bases and with the original authors as part of it, it is super safe and recommended.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1603957501